Research at the INSEAD Ethics and Social Responsibilty Initiative
The INSEAD Ethics and Social Responsibility Initiative (ESRI) explores the ethical challenges and social responsibilities that shape business today. Its research combines normative and empirical perspectives to examine both what businesses and managers should do and how ethical decisions are made, organisations behave, and business practices affect stakeholders and society.
Drawing on perspectives from across management disciplines, ESRI explores issues such as ethical decision-making, responsible leadership, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and the ethical implications of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence. Through rigorous academic research, ESRI aims to advance understanding of these issues and generate insights that inform responsible management practice.
Beyond research, ESRI translates academic findings for managers and other audiences, helping to bridge the gap between scholarship and practice. It also supports the teaching of ethics and social responsibility at INSEAD and other schools, in line with INSEAD’s mission to develop responsible business leaders. This includes pedagogical initiatives and case study research and development.
ESRI also fosters collaboration and academic exchange, bringing together INSEAD faculty, academic researchers, and business practitioners to explore pressing ethical challenges and develop insights with practical relevance.
ESRI is led by Professor N. Craig Smith, INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility. His research over more than 30 years has focused on the intersection of business and society, encompassing business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability. He is also Programme Director of INSEAD’s Healthcare Ethics and Compliance Programme (HECP), which offers five in-person and live-virtual executive education programmes.
ESRI develops and facilitates research across a range of business ethics and social responsibility issues. Current research examines questions related to:
- Antecedents of company engagement in business partnerships for sustainability
- Organized immaturity
- Ethically motivated leadership
- Corporate political activism
- Normativity in business
- Business and human rights
- Rawls and business ethics
- Corporate moral agency
- Business ethics and social contract theory
- Access to medicines
- Ethics and compliance
- The business case for corporate social responsibility
- Employee preference for socially responsible organisations
- Boards and sustainability
- Marketing ethics
- Marketing ethics during Covid and other times of trouble
- Responsible marketing
- Ethical blindness
- Grand Challenges and the Responsibility of Business
- Mandating corporate social responsibility
Publication Highlights
What Makes Companies Do the Right Thing?
Corporate Responsibility Meets the Digital Economy
A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance
Research Presentations
"The Trouble with Authenticity: Brand Authenticity as a Thick Concept and Why No Brand Can Show That It Has It"
ESRI Postdoctoral Researcher Minji Jang and Craig Smith, INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility and Academic Director of ESRI, presented their research paper “The Trouble with Authenticity: Brand Authenticity as a Thick Concept and Why No Brand Can Show That It Has It” at the Society for Business Ethics (SBE) Annual Conference in Philadelphia in July 2026, following a pre-read session at Business Ethics in the 6ix in Toronto in May. The paper develops a “thicker” concept of brand authenticity, examining the conditions under which brands can be considered authentic and the fundamental challenge of demonstrating the motivations underlying their commitments.
“Business Ethics and Democracy – Illiberalism as a Challenge for Business and Society”
Craig Smith, INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility and Academic Director of ESRI, presented research with Markus Scholz, Professor at Technische Universität Dresden and ESRI Visiting Scholar, and D.S. Benedikt Kapteina, Research Fellow at Technische Universität Dresden, at the “Business Ethics and Democracy – Illiberalism as a Challenge for Business and Society” workshop in Philadelphia in July 2026. Building on discussions from ESRI’s 2024 Signature Event, the research introduces the concept of Corporate Democratic Action (CDA) and examines if, when and how companies might appropriately engage in protecting democratic principles and institutions, while considering the potential risks and limits of corporate political engagement.
“Judgments of Marketing Ethics in Times of Trouble”
ESRI External Affiliate Yvetta (Iveta) Simonyan, Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer in Management & Marketing at the University of Bath, and Craig Smith, INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility and Academic Director of ESRI, presented the paper “Judgments of Marketing Ethics in Times of Trouble” at the EMAC Conference in Bath in June 2026. The research examines how crises influence consumers’ ethical evaluations of marketing practices, suggesting that vulnerability and the nature of a crisis can affect how questionable practices are judged.
“What Constitutes Reasonable Care in Human-AI Systems?”
ESRI Postdoctoral Researcher Minji Jang presented the paper “What Constitutes Reasonable Care in Human-AI Systems?” at the European Business Ethics Network (EBEN) Annual Conference in Rennes in May. Co-authored with ESRI Visiting Scholars Leena Lankoski and David Ronnegard, and INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility Craig Smith, the paper examines how responsibility and ethical care can be understood in Human-AI systems, where agency is distributed, outcomes are uncertain, and decision-making increasingly involves both human and technological actors.
“Moral Responsibility in Human-AI Systems”
Craig Smith, Academic Director of ESRI and INSEAD Chaired Professor of Ethics and Social Responsibility, together with ESRI Visiting Scholars David Rönnegard and Leena Lankoski, contributed to a session on “Moral Responsibility in Human-AI Systems” at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Conference 2025 in Copenhagen. Chaired by ESRI Postdoctoral Researcher Minji Jang, the session explored questions of agency, blame and accountability when AI systems make harmful decisions, examining how moral responsibility should be understood as AI becomes increasingly embedded in decision-making.
Selected Publications by ESRI Team Members
Leena Lankoski
- Salmivaara, L., & Lankoski, L. (2021). Promoting sustainable consumer behaviour through the activation of injunctive social norms: A field experiment in 19 workplace restaurants. Organization & Environment, 34(3), 361-386. (open access)
- Salmivaara, L., Lombardini, C., & Lankoski, L. (2021). Examining social norms among other motives for sustainable food choice: The promise of descriptive norms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127508. (open access)
- Halme, M., Rintamäki, J., Knudsen, J. S., Lankoski, L., & Kuisma, M. (2020). When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Business and Society, 59(6), 1181-1227. (Winner of Best Article Award 2020) (non-paywalled version available here)
- Guillaume, J. H. A., Sojamo, S., Porkka, M., Gerten, D., Jalava, M., Lankoski, L., . . . Kummu, M. (2020). Giving legs to handprint thinking: Foundations for evaluating the good we do. Earth's Future, 8(6). (open access)
- Lankoski, L. (2016). Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 847-857. (non-paywalled version available here)
- Forssell, S., & Lankoski, L. (2015). The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: An examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values, 32(1), 63-75. (publisher’s shareable link here)
- Lombardini, C., & Lankoski, L. (2013). Forced choice restriction in promoting sustainable food consumption: Intended and unintended effects of the mandatory vegetarian day in Helsinki schools. Journal of Consumer Policy, 36(2), 159-178. (publisher’s shareable link here)
- Lankoski, L. (2008). Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: A theory of why and how they are connected. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 536-547
Leandro Nardi
- The Corporate Social Responsibility Price Premium as an Enabler of Substantive CSR. Academy of Management Review, 2022, vol. 47, n° 2, pp 282-308
- Doing Well by Doing Good, Uniquely: Materiality and the Market Value of Unique CSR Strategies. Strategy Science, Mars 2022, vol. 7, n° 1, pp 10-26, (in coll. with T. Zenger, S. G. LAZZARINI, S. Cabral)
- Impact measurement tools and social value creation: a strategic perspective. Handbook On The Business Of Sustainability: The Organization, Implementation, And Practice Of Sustainable Growth, G. George, Martine R. Haas, H. Joshi, A. M. McGahan, P. Tracey, Edward Elgar Publishing, 5, 458-472
- Can Public Organizations Perform Like Private Firms? The Role of Heterogeneous Resources and Practices. Organization Science, July-August 2023, vol. 34, n° 4, pp 1527-1553, (in coll. with T. Teodorovicz, S. Lazzarini, S. Cabral)
David Rönnegard
- Rönnegard, D. 2015. The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency. Springer Publications.
- Rönnegard, D. 2013. How Autonomy Alone Debunks Corporate Moral Agency. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 32(1/2), 77–107.
- Rönnegard, D. 2024. Corporate Accountability. Not Moral Responsibility. Journal of Human Values.
- Rönnegard, D., & Velasquez, M. 2017. On (Not) Attributing Moral Responsibility to Organizations, in Eric W. Orts, and N. Craig Smith (eds), The Moral Responsibility of Firms. Oxford Academic.
- Sandberg, J., & Rönnegard, D. 2020. Sustainable Investment: Mobilizing Financial Capital for Sustainable Development. Decent Work and Economic Growth. Springer Publications.
Markus Scholz
- Scholz, M. & Smith, N.C. (2024): ‘What Makes Leaders Do the Right Thing?’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 66(1).
- Scherer, A., Neesham, C., Schoeneborn, D., & Scholz, M. (2023): ‘New Challenges to the Enlightenment: How Twenty-First-Century Sociotechnological Systems Facilitate Organized Immaturity and How to Counteract It‘, Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), pp. 409-439.
- Riegler, M., Burton, A. M., Scholz, M., & de Melo, K. (2023): ‘Why Companies Team Up for Sustainable Development: Antecedents of Company Engagement in Business Partnerships for Sustainability’, Business Strategy and the Environment, pp. 1– 15.
- De los Reyes, G. & Scholz. M. (2022): ‘Assessing the Legitimacy of Corporate Political Activity: Uber and the Quest for Responsible Innovation’, Journal of Business Ethics, OnlineFirst article.
- Kump, B. & Scholz, M. (2022): ‘Organizational Routines as a Source of Ethical Blindness’, Organization Theory, Vol. 3 (1), February 26, 2022.
- Fink, M., Hatak, I., Scholz, M. & Down, S. (2019): ‘He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune? Setting the Stage for an Informed Discourse on Third-Party Funding of Academic Business Research’, Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 13, pp. 1-19.
- De los Reyes, G. & Scholz, M. (2019): ‘The Limits of the Business Case for Sustainability: Don’t Count on Creating Shared Value to Extinguish Corporate Destruction’, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 221, 785-794.
- Ortiz, D., Domnanovich, J., Kronenberg, C. & Scholz, M. (2018): ‘Exploring the Integration of Corporate Social Responsibility into the Strategies of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review’, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 201, pp. 254-271.