- Search
Search
- LoginAccess your ApplicationFor current applicantsOr learn more about our programmes and applyAccess MyINSEADFor current participants and alumni
Keywords
;
Journal Article
Greenwald A. G., Poehlman A., Uhlmann E. L., Banaji M. R. (2009). Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), (pp17-41).
This review of 122 research reports (184 independent samples, 14,900 subjects) found average r = .274 for prediction of behavioral, judgment, and physiological measures by Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures. Parallel explicit (i.e., self-report) measures, available in 156 of these samples (13,068 subjects), also predicted effectively (average r = .361), but with much greater variability of effect size.