How SouthWest Airlines Found a Route to Success
W. Chan Kim and Renée
Mauborgne
In the second of a weekly series, W.
Chan Kim and Renée
Mauborgne explain how companies can find opportunities for innovation
by looking at substitute industries
The airline industry is renowned as one of the world's most competitive.
When one carrier cuts prices, the others follow. When another installs
cappuccino bars in airport lounges, others imitate. The intensity of competition,
coupled with high costs of maintenance, safety, crew, fuel and aircraft,
makes consistent profitable growth a heroic achievement.
Yet Southwest Airlines of the US side-stepped all of that. It made the
competition irrelevant by creating a new market: short-haul air transport.
Not only does Southwest always increase demand, often quadrupling or quintupling
the number of passengers on the routes it flies, it has been consistently
profitable for more than 25 years, a feat that has been accomplished by
no other airline.
The reasons for Southwest's success are well documented: it focuses
on short-haul flights with an average distance of 425 miles. It does away
with meals, in-flight films, designated seats, multiple seating classes
from first to economy, membership in an airline reservation system, central
airports, and a hub-and-spoke route system - all previously assumed to
be indispensable to success.
In their place Southwest created the concept of frequent point-to-point
flights, with fares often 60 per cent below competitors', plastic reusable
boarding passes, airports in small cities or smaller, less-congested airports
in larger cities and 15-minute gate turnrounds (against 35 minutes for
the average carrier).
But where did Southwest find the insight to create this new market?
How did it break out of the conventional wisdom that defined how airlines
compete?
The answers to these questions also explain how Home Depot gained the
insight to create the Do-It-Yourself market in the US, and how Kinepolis,
the Belgian cinema group, transformed European cinema with megaplexes.
Instead of focusing on rivals within an industry, these companies moved
across industries. But not just any industry; they moved across substitute
industries.
Southwest understood that for short-haul destinations, surface transport,
namely the car, was a substitute for flying. By concentrating on the factors
that lead people to choose one of these forms of transport over the other,
and eliminating or reducing everything else, the imagination of Southwest
was born.
Consider people who choose flying over driving for short journeys. What
is the key factor in their decision? Do people fly because they want multiple
seating-classes, meals, in-flight films or designated seats? The answer
is, quite simply, no. Fundamentally, there is only one factor that makes
people choose flying over driving: speed. People fly to save time.
Accordingly, Southwest created point-to-point flights to make short-haul
travel even quicker and used secondary airports which cut an additional
15-25 per cent off average flight time (the result of reduced taxi time,
fewer gate holds and less stacking in the air to land).
To understand the rest of the Southwest formula, consider the flip side:
why do some people choose the car over the aircraft for short journeys?
Because it is cheap and you can leave when you choose.
Hence, Southwest's innovation of frequent flights throughout the day
and tickets priced not against other airlines but dramatically lower against
surface transport.
By focusing on the key discriminating factors of both flying and driving,
and eliminating or reducing everything else, Southwest has inserted itself
creatively between airlines and surface transport, thereby creating a new
and highly profitable market.
Like airlines, companies in most industries compete, in a broad sense,
with other industries producing substitute products or services. In almost
anything we do - whether we are institutional buyers, industrial buyers
or individuals - we intuitively compare substitutes.
Yet companies often forget this. From their point of view, substitutes
operate in a distant and seemingly unrelated market. So airlines compete
fiercely among themselves and benchmark one another's actions, as do carmakers.
But neither industry pays much heed to the other.
It is in the space between substitute industries that tremendous opportunities
exist for creating new markets. The critical question is: what are the
key factors that make buyers choose one substitute over another? The point
is to look beyond the key factors rivals compete on within an industry
and focus instead on the broad discriminating factors that lead buyers
to move across substitute industries.
When Home Depot applied this path to new market creation, it saw that
for home improvement there were two substitutes: ironmongers and professional
contractors. While people patronised ironmongers for low-cost items, they
went to contractors for their know-how.
Home Depot combined the low price of ironmongers with the expertise
of professional contractors. It recruited sales staff with expert knowledge.
and sponsored in-store clinics to teach customers skills. The result: neither
ironmongers nor contractors could compete with Home Depot's breakthrough
in value for money. In 20 years Home Depot has become a Dollars 24bn
business, creating 130,000 jobs in more than 660 stores.
Similarly, Federal Express and United Parcel Service created a new market
by delivering mail at the near speed of phone, and Intuit's Quicken recreated
the personal finance software market by combining the low price and ease
of use of doing calculations by pencil with the speed and accuracy of traditional
personal finance software.
Kinepolis combined the best of cinema - large screens and spectacular
sound and pictures - with the best of watching videos at home on a VCR
- comfy seats, wide choice, no hassles, no waiting for tickets and babysitting
facilities - to create the 25 or 30-screen megaplex cinema.
Is your company locked in competition with rivals in your industry?
To break out of this, search for other products and services that can perform
the same function as the products and services of your industry. If several
substitutes are identified, focus on those with the greatest volume and
value. Think of Southwest focusing on the car, but not buses, which are
used by only a minority of Americans.
Then ask: what are the key factors that lead buyers to choose one substitute
over another? By concentrating on the strengths of both substitutes and
eliminating or reducing everything else, your company too can be on the
road to profitable growth.
Next week: how Swatch, The Body Shop, Starbucks and Direct Line Insurance
created new market space by shifting the appeal of their industry.
| W. Chan Kim is The Boston Consulting Group Bruce D. Henderson Chair
Professor of International Management at INSEAD, France.
Renée Mauborgne is The INSEAD Distinguished
Fellow and a professor of strategy and management at INSEAD, and a Fellow of the World Economic Forum.
Copyright (c) The Financial Times Limited.
 |
|