The Bright Idea that Conquered America
W. Chan Kim and Renée
Mauborgne
Philips owes the huge success of its environmentally friendly light
bulb to a new definition of who it should be selling to and a clear understanding
of the needs of those buyers
For more than 80 years General Electric dominated the US lighting industry
with a market share of more than 50 per cent. GE's manpower, pedigree,
presence and financial clout let it define the rules.
As GE courted corporate purchasing departments, its competitors hypnotically
followed suit. Everyone in the industry moved in step, listening to corporate
purchasing departments' needs and improving their product accordingly.
The result was a commodity product that forced manufacturers to compete
on price, brand name and old boy networks - all factors where GE enjoyed
a huge advantage.
Then in 1995, Philips Lighting, the North American division of Philips
Electronics, launched the Alto, the first environmentally friendly light
bulb.
Unlike traditional bulbs, the Alto contains very low levels of toxic
mercury. As a result, it allows big savings. While a typical fluorescent
lamp costs around 80 cents to buy, replacement costs can reach Dollars
1 per light because of restrictions in collection and disposal, and legal
coverage against possible pollution at dumping sites.
The Alto can be thrown straight in the rubbish bin. It has superior
profit margins, a rapidly growing market, and has already replaced more
than one in four traditional T-12 fluorescent lamps in schools, office
buildings and hospitals in the US. It is also winning tremendous free press
and political backing for helping to protect the environment.
But where did Philips Lighting get the insight to create this market?
How did it see an opportunity for high growth and profits where others
saw only a low-growth commodity industry dominated by one of the toughest
companies in corporate America?
Simply put, Philips defied conventional wisdom that said lighting companies
should sell to corporate purchasing managers. Corporate purchasers had
one overriding concern: to minimise upfront costs. For more than 50 years,
they had asked the same two questions: what does the light bulb cost? and
how long will it last?
By switching its attention to chief financial officers, Philips discovered
the paradox of its industry. While purchasing managers haggled with manufacturers
over purchase price, it turned out that this initial expense sometimes
accounted for as little as half the total cost to the company. The purchasing
departments never saw the costs of disposal - but, much later, the CFO
did.
So Philips dramatically reduced the level of mercury in its bulbs to
pass all legal tests of being environmentally friendly. Philips Lighting
then used both CFOs and public relations campaigns to drive the purchase
of the Alto. Companies, the environment and Philips came out big winners.
In most industries there is a chain of "customers" who are directly
or indirectly involved in the buying decision. There are the purchasers
who pay for the product or service of the industry. There are the users
of the product or service that is purchased. And then there are influencers,
who play a critical role in deciding which product or service to buy. In
children's medicine, for example, the purchasers are the parents, the users
are the children, and the influencers are the doctors.
These different groups often value very different things. A corporate
purchasing agent, for example, may focus on cost, while a user may be more
concerned with ease of use.
While in many industries competing firms target different customer segments
- for example, wealthy, middle income, and the less well-off; or large,
medium or small companies - there is often tremendous convergence on the
buyer group all players in the industry focus on.
Before the Alto, the lighting industry focused almost exclusively on
corporate purchasers. The pharmaceutical industry focuses mainly on the
influencers, namely the doctors. And the clothing industry focuses keenly
on the users, the wearers.
Sometimes this is because of economic rationale. Often, however, it
is due to conventional industry practices that have never been questioned.
By breaking out of this convergent behaviour companies can discover fundamentally
new sources of value that were not apparent before.
Think of Bloomberg, which in little over a decade has become one of
the largest and most profitable business information providers in the world.
Bloomberg leapfrogged Reuters and Telerate in the online financial information
sector by shifting its focus from the IT managers who had traditionally
purchased financial information systems to the traders who used them.
Bloomberg's innovation was to provide online analytics that perform
financial calculations, historical price information and lifestyle information
that the users, rather than the purchasers, value. It also greatly increased
the terminals' ease of use.
In the copier industry, Xerox, Kodak and International Business Machines
focused on corporate purchasers, who value big machines centrally located
that can handle large orders and process them quickly. Canon created a
new market of personal copiers by targeting the users - the secretaries.
This opened its eyes to the importance of distributed copying with small
machines, low price, and smaller copying needs. Today, Canon sells more
copiers than any other company in the world.
In contrast, SAP, the German business software group, created the integrated,
real-time software market by shifting the focus from traditional departmental
users to corporate IT purchasers.
In industry after industry, the room to create new markets and recreate
existing ones by shifting the focal buyer group is tremendous. To apply
this to your business begin by asking: Who is the focal buyer group of
your industry? Who could, and should, be the focal buyer group of your
industry?
The aim is to break out of industry-convergent behaviour by shifting
the focal buyer group among users, purchasers and influencers to create
value in fundamentally new ways.
Next week, we discuss moving across substitute industries: how companies
as diverse as Southwest Airlines, Home Depot, Intuit, and the Belgian cinema
group Kinepolis applied the same underlying pattern of strategic thinking
to create powerful new market space.
| Renée Mauborgne is The INSEAD Distinguished
Fellow and a professor of strategy and management at INSEAD and a Fellow of the
World Economic Forum.
W. Chan Kim is The Boston Consulting Group Bruce D. Henderson Chair
Professor of International Management at INSEAD, France.
Copyright (c) The Financial Times Limited.
 |
|