Journal Article
This research tested the idea that lack of material resources (e.g., low income) causes people
to make harsher moral judgments because lack of material resources is associated with a
lower ability to cope with the effects of others’ harmful behavior.
Consistent with this idea, a
large cross-cultural survey (Study 1) found that both chronic (low income) and situational
(inflation) lack of material resources were associated with harsher moral judgments. The
effect of inflation was stronger for low-income individuals, whom inflation renders relatively
more vulnerable.
A follow-up experiment (Study 2) caused participants to perceive they
lacked material resources by employing different anchors on the scale they used to report their
income.
The manipulation led to harsher judgments of harmful, but not of non-harmful,
transgressions and this effect was explained by a sense of vulnerability. Alternative
explanations were excluded.
These results demonstrate a functional and contextually situated
nature of moral psychology.
Faculty
Professor of Organisational Behaviour